Iraq Reviews > US 'privatizing' war in Iraq, Afghanistan? « NWO Observer
[NWO Observer] In a much-anticipated address in Cairo University in Egypt on Thursday, the US President Barack Obama said the United States seeks no permanent presence in Afghanistan, while adding that Washington is planning to remove forces from Iraq by the end of 2011.
[Previous] Iraq war vet explores run against Rodriguez...
[Next] Congress Could Investigate War Fraud With a Mirror | Let&...
Some related posts from Technorati and Google.
[NWO Observer] Obama in Cairo: a new face for imperialism”¦ « NWO Observer: He declared his opposition to the “killing of innocent men, women, and children,” but defended the ongoing US wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and the US proxy war in Pakistan, while remaining silent on the most recent Israeli slaughter of Palestinians in Gaza. These wars have killed at least one million Iraqis and tens of thousands in Afghanistan, Pakistan and the Palestinian territories.
[US News] U.S. General: 10 More Years of Iraq War: After we remove our combat brigades, our mission will change from combat to supporting the Iraqi government and its Security Forces as they take the absolute lead in securing their country. As I have long said, we will retain a transitional force to carry out three distinct functions: training, equipping, and advising Iraqi Security Forces as long as they remain non-sectarian;
[NWO Observer] Army chief says US ready to be in Iraq 10 years”¦ « NWO Observer: He said his planning envisions combat troops in Iraq and Afghanistan for a decade as part of a sustained U.S. commitment to fighting extremism and terrorism in the Middle East. Casey's calculations about force .
[Dandelion Salad] Obama's Speech - America's Violent Extremism By Paul Craig Roberts ...: and al-Qaedas responsibility, not Americas desire for military bases and hegemony, are the reasons Americas commitment to combating violent extremism in Afghanistan will not weaken. Will Muslims notice that Obamas case for Americas violent extremism in Afghanistan and now Pakistan is hypocritical?
[Truthout - All Articles] t r u t h o u t | A Day in the Life: Obama cannot give up his focus on the deteriorating situation in Pakistan for a variety of reasons, one being the ongoing and umbilically connected American war in neighboring Afghanistan, another being the fact that bungling the Pakistan situation could unleash a sub-continental conflagration that would imperil us all, and, well, those two reasons pretty much do the trick. Pakistan is fighting the Taliban in its own streets, and the security of Pakistan's nuclear arsenal is dubious on the best of days.
[NWOTruth] Army chief says US ready to be in Iraq 10 years | NWOTruth: President Barack Obama plans to bring U.S. combat forces home from Iraq in 2010, and the United States and Iraq have agreed that all American forces would leave by 2012. Although several senior U.S. officials have suggested Iraq could request an extension, the legal agreement the two countries signed last year would have to be amended for any significant U.S. presence to remain.
[Hot Air » Top Picks] Hot Air » Blog Archive » Unemployment up to 9.4%: Democrats have had to put the war supplemental to fund the troops in Iraq and Afghanistan on hold because they lack the votes to pass the modified bill that came out of conference. The Democrat leadership has reduced the amount of the supplemental for the troops and tacked on $108 billion in bailout funding for foreign governments through the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
[Locust blog] TOM CHITTUM - CIVIL WAR TWO - THE BREAK UP OF THE UNITED STATES ...: This is the exact opposite of the global depopulation and genocide via starvation and war that the New World Order is imposing on the rest of the globe via the Club of Rome and their other psychotic think tanks and NGOs. Russia and China and some neighboring states have formed a double whammy military and economic bloc called the Shanghai Cooperation Organization.
[Bill's Blog] Bill's Blog » Blog Archive » The Official 9/11 Fairy Tale Is ...: Since Saddam Hussein’s Iraq posed no threat to the US, overthrowing his government had negligible direct impact on American national security. But invasion under the doctrine of preventive war in defiance of international institutions and under false pretences, plus the deployment of more than 150,000 troops for more than five years has wrought far-reaching national security harm….”
[The Swamp] Obama: 'New beginning' in Cairo: The Swamp: What I find absurd is this line "tension has been fed by colonialism that denied rights and opportunities to many Muslims." If you look at the current Muslim World, where better than half of the population (female) is denied basic civil rights, where the only education available is religious in the Masadras, where citizenship rights are contingent on being the correct religion, and where religous conversions are punishable by death, I think that while, yes, the colonial era did have a major impact on these countries, their current leaders are as much, if not more, to blame for the situation in the world.
[Joels Trumpet] Joels Trumpet » Blog Archive » Ahmadinejad & Assad: Iran & Syria ...: In their statements following the meeting, Ahmadinejad and Assad stressed that “the continued support of the Palestinian resistance and of the Iraqi government until the withdrawal of the [Israeli and American] occupiers is one of Iran and Syria’s top priorities.”(18) Ahmadinejad called supporting the Palestinian resistance a human and popular duty incumbent upon Iran and Syria, saying, “[At the Durban conference] in Geneva we held up a mirror to the faces [of the Westerners], and saw how they were afraid to look even at their own reflection… When we hold a mirror up to their faces, we discover who the [real] axis of evil is…
[Recent Blog Posts: Bakersfield.com] Don't Believe Me, Do Your Own Research - Bakersfield.com -: I think it is dreadful that some people are trying to suggest that people who are Muslims are bad, and they want to lump Obama in with Bin Laden, as if to say all Muslims are terrorists. They're not, and this line of argument is shameful.
[Balloon Juice] Balloon Juice » Blog Archive » Almost?: And I don't think that wanting Obama to torture, wire-tap, keep Gitmo open, etc. means that you want America to get attacked.
[Dandelion Salad] Barack Obama: A New Beginning (Cairo University 06.04.09 ...: Let me also address the issue of Iraq. Unlike Afghanistan, Iraq was a war of choice that provoked strong differences in my country and around the world. Although I believe that the Iraqi people are ultimately better off without the tyranny of Saddam Hussein, I also believe that events in Iraq have reminded America of the need to use diplomacy and build international consensus to resolve our problems whenever possible. (Applause.) Indeed, we can recall the words of Thomas Jefferson, who said: “I hope that our wisdom will grow with our power, and teach us that the less we use our power the greater it will be.”
Reflected tags on Technorati: Blog, United Nations Tag Page, 911: Blogs, Photos, Videos And More On Technorati, 911: Blogs, Photos, Videos And More On Technorati, Military Industrial Complex: Blogs, Photos, Videos And More On ..., Tag Page For: War-on-terrorism, Iraq Reviews