Some related posts from Technorati and Google.

[SAJAforum] PREZ RACE: The Democrats - Clinton or Obama for the South Asian ...: After seven years of Republican control of the White House, during which we saw an unjustified, unneeded, and unwanted preemptive war waged against a sovereign country, costing us, so far, half a Trillion dollars, loss of almost 4000 American lives, more than 700,000 Iraqi citizens, leaving over 4 million refugees and tarnishing the image of America all over the Globe, the voters are yearning for change. Over 70% of the people in this country are dissatisfied with the current conditions, with rapidly increasing price of the gasoline costing more than three dollars per gallon, foreclosing homes at the largest rate than ever, climbing healthcare cost, leaving 47 million people without health insurance, and making education unaffordable and increasing rate of poverty.

 [Comments from Left Field] Fact Checking The Fact Checker: Finally, the Clinton campaign accuses Obama for abandoning his politics of hope, an accusation they have leveled upon him from the very first moment Obama decided not to restrict his comments regarding Hillary to unadulterated adolation.  The problem, the accusation doesn’t play.  There is nothing wrong, I repeat, absolutely nothing wrong opposing a candidate based upon their stances and actions on the issues.  The quote that Hillary picks out specifically is interesting because the Clinton campaign has distorted Obama’s record far more severely as noted above, and also witnessed in her constant attack of his “present” votes in the Illinois Senate, votes, might I remind you after explaining this several times already, that were parliamentary maneuvers specifically undertaken to win battles in the name of progressive values.

 [The Fact Hub] Sen. Obama's Speech In Denver, CO Will Contain Four Misleading ...: “It’s time for new leadership that understands that the way to win a debate with John McCain is not by nominating someone who agreed with him on voting for the war in Iraq; who agreed with him in voting to give George Bush the benefit of the doubt on Iran;

 [My 2 Cents] Clinton, Obama, Edwards - oh my! (not to mention the rest of them!): John McCain ~ in my opinion he’s batshit crazy, but he’ll be the Republican nominee most likely.  Other than Huckabee he’s probably the best Republican for the Democrat to run against.  Not to be ageist, but he’s old and it’s going to show as he runs against the much younger Democrats.  He’s also completely out of step with the majority of the country- staying in Iraq for 100 years?  That’s not going to go over well.

 [Skunks's Weblog] Huffington`S pOST: Considering Hillary Clinton’s appearance, they would do well to Penn to ignore advice and attention on the Iraq war and its terrible consequences for national security to steer. Because even in Nevada, the NationWide the highest number of forced auctions, will the inhabitants at the end of the candidates decide to ensure their safety, and not for those who find their mortgage repayments easier.

 [www.hyerstandard.com] Where Do They Stand: The Policies of Obama and Clinton: From education to tax policy, the Iraq War to energy independence, these candidates seemingly do have established positions on the policies that matter to Americans most, however the coverage of the race might make you think otherwise. That being said I am going to compare and contrast the differences -and from time to time, similarities- between Senator Barack Obama and Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton.

[Oliver Willis] Sen. Clinton And Iraq: It's 'accurate' because they specifically say that Clinton and Obama have the same "voting records" on Iraq. Her vote for authorization doesn't count in the comparison because Obama wasn't in office to vote on the authorization.

 [John Brown's Public Diplomacy Press and Blog Review] Public Diplomacy Press and Blog Review, January 30-31, 2008: Presidential candidates cite intent to improve US stature, but retooling policies is complicated - Howard LaFranchi (Christian Science Monitor, January 30): With global views of the United States seemingly stuck at historic lows, improving America’s image abroad has emerged as a prominent issue of the 2008 presidential campaign. Reversing the low stature may be helped along by the arrival of a fresh face in the White House, but what it will really take is a change in unpopular policies, analysts say—from the war in Iraq to the more restrictive criteria for granting US visas.

 [TPMCafe blogs] Setting a Few Matters Straight: Why I'm for Hillary and not Obama ...: There must be a plan that will begin to bring our troops home.” But she also said, “I do not think it is a smart strategy either for the president to continue with his open-ended commitment which I think does not put enough pressure on the Iraqi government, nor do I think it is a smart policy to set a date certain.”[63][64]

[Random Musings] Barack Obama Kennedy: In a way, JFK played matchmaker to Obama's parents, since as senator he drafted the legislation that brought Kenyan exchange students to the U.S., including Obama Sr., who met Barack's mother at the University of Hawaii. Caroline's father would no doubt be surprised that his organic heir and continuator is Obama Jr.

[The Daily Pulp: Bob Norman's Blog] Hillary Clinton: Retro-Candidate: Then came Shock and Awe and the illegal Iraq War, in which America played the role of invader. So far it has left a country in ruin, spilled blood from all sides, and left a generation of American soldiers to pay the emotional and physical toll.

Reflected tags on Technorati: Blog, Democrat: Blogs, Photos, Videos And More On Technorati, Hillary Clinton: Blogs, Photos, Videos And More On Technorati, O'Reilly Dodd: Blogs, Photos, Videos And More On Technorati, Democrat: Blogs, Photos, Videos And More On Technorati, Senator Hillary Clinton: Blogs, Photos, Videos And More On Technorati, Iraq Reviews